<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing an economic illiterate to an economics fight</title>
	<atom:link href="/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=1440</link>
	<description>Home of the Liberal Burger</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Again</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=1440#comment-56512</link>
		<dc:creator>Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=1440#comment-56512</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lehman Brothers...Merrill Lynch,...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

not to forget AIG...

and again...

"After all, it’s starting to look as if the rule is heads you win, tails the taxpayers lose."
(Paul Krugman, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/opinion/15krugman.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Financial Russian Roulette&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/09/paul-krugman-fi.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;second link&lt;/a&gt;)

better than Communism, huh?

in Communism, at least the argumentation is about "all for all" - we have only the losses?

i've read, that now 85% of AIG "belongs to all"

America, i guess, it is time to come out of your Pavlov-chains that everything for the Rich is "individualism" = good and everything for the rest is "communism" = evil. You see - it simply doesn't work, because...

&lt;blockquote&gt;“the fundamentals of our economy are strong.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

if this would be true, at least the producing industry - the ones, really creating value - would be not suffering...

so how about that? 

isn't the producing industry now mostly chinese (or indian)? And China and India surely will not risk to lose what they got in the last decades...

reminds me of a saying i've read googling for General Motors: "As goes General Motors so goes America"

what a heritage Mr. Bush will leave - truly a name made for history books!

&lt;blockquote&gt;They brought an economic illiterate to an economics fight.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

and will win because of that?

reminds me of some comments: 

Larkrise:
"It no longer is :”What on earth are people thinking?” but, that millions lack the ability to think at all."

VettaKing;
"so the illiterate lemmings who suck up the air of America can wrap their tiny little minds around the relatively simple concepts being proposed."

again - what a heritage Mr. Bush will leave. This name will sound like thunder: the new &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croesus" rel="nofollow"&gt;Croesus&lt;/a&gt; - rich and empire-killing...

Awake, America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lehman Brothers&#8230;Merrill Lynch,&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>not to forget AIG&#8230;</p>
<p>and again&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;After all, it’s starting to look as if the rule is heads you win, tails the taxpayers lose.&#8221;<br />
(Paul Krugman, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/opinion/15krugman.html" rel="nofollow">Financial Russian Roulette</a>,  <a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/09/paul-krugman-fi.html" rel="nofollow">second link</a>)</p>
<p>better than Communism, huh?</p>
<p>in Communism, at least the argumentation is about &#8220;all for all&#8221; - we have only the losses?</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve read, that now 85% of AIG &#8220;belongs to all&#8221;</p>
<p>America, i guess, it is time to come out of your Pavlov-chains that everything for the Rich is &#8220;individualism&#8221; = good and everything for the rest is &#8220;communism&#8221; = evil. You see - it simply doesn&#8217;t work, because&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>“the fundamentals of our economy are strong.”</p></blockquote>
<p>if this would be true, at least the producing industry - the ones, really creating value - would be not suffering&#8230;</p>
<p>so how about that? </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t the producing industry now mostly chinese (or indian)? And China and India surely will not risk to lose what they got in the last decades&#8230;</p>
<p>reminds me of a saying i&#8217;ve read googling for General Motors: &#8220;As goes General Motors so goes America&#8221;</p>
<p>what a heritage Mr. Bush will leave - truly a name made for history books!</p>
<blockquote><p>They brought an economic illiterate to an economics fight.</p></blockquote>
<p>and will win because of that?</p>
<p>reminds me of some comments: </p>
<p>Larkrise:<br />
&#8220;It no longer is :”What on earth are people thinking?” but, that millions lack the ability to think at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>VettaKing;<br />
&#8220;so the illiterate lemmings who suck up the air of America can wrap their tiny little minds around the relatively simple concepts being proposed.&#8221;</p>
<p>again - what a heritage Mr. Bush will leave. This name will sound like thunder: the new <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croesus" rel="nofollow">Croesus</a> - rich and empire-killing&#8230;</p>
<p>Awake, America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
