<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry, John, leaders of the Religious Right aren’t nice</title>
	<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165</link>
	<description>Home of the Liberal Burger</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  4 May 2007 14:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: AnotherRich</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-398</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-398</guid>
					<description>We should all remember that being slicker than #%!t is the stock in trade of all confidence men and hucksters.  I would be greatly surprised if the religious right yahoos mentioned above were not able to turn on some charm when required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should all remember that being slicker than #%!t is the stock in trade of all confidence men and hucksters.  I would be greatly surprised if the religious right yahoos mentioned above were not able to turn on some charm when required.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Again</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-384</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 10:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-384</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;they can be a “pleasant person” while committing unspeakable acts. If they are capable of doing unspeakable things and disassociating themselves (as a person ) from those acts then they are bipolar at best and pathological at worst&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

sorry, sudden association (&quot;committing unspeakable acts&quot;)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traudl_Junge&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Traudl Junge&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Junge later said she felt great guilt for &quot;...liking the greatest criminal ever to have lived.&quot;
She said, &quot;I admit, I was fascinated by Adolf Hitler. He was a pleasant boss and a fatherly friend.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a Href=&quot;http://schikelgruber.net/hitler4.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A SUBSERVIENT HERO or THE MAKING OF A MONSTER&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;A modest and charming young man

As time passed, Mrs. Popp found him very helpful: Hitler would help her around the house, beating carpets, bringing in the coal or filling her list at the market. The Popps found Hitler to be a modest and charming young man who kept himself and his room very clean. The Popps' children and parents were also &quot;very fond of the young man&quot; and felt that Herr Adolf Hitler was a &quot;nice&quot; person.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>they can be a “pleasant person” while committing unspeakable acts. If they are capable of doing unspeakable things and disassociating themselves (as a person ) from those acts then they are bipolar at best and pathological at worst</p></blockquote>
<p>sorry, sudden association (&#8221;committing unspeakable acts&#8221;)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traudl_Junge" rel="nofollow">Traudl Junge</a></p>
<p><i>Junge later said she felt great guilt for &#8220;&#8230;liking the greatest criminal ever to have lived.&#8221;<br />
She said, &#8220;I admit, I was fascinated by Adolf Hitler. He was a pleasant boss and a fatherly friend.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a Href="http://schikelgruber.net/hitler4.html" rel="nofollow">A SUBSERVIENT HERO or THE MAKING OF A MONSTER</a></p>
<p><i>A modest and charming young man</p>
<p>As time passed, Mrs. Popp found him very helpful: Hitler would help her around the house, beating carpets, bringing in the coal or filling her list at the market. The Popps found Hitler to be a modest and charming young man who kept himself and his room very clean. The Popps&#8217; children and parents were also &#8220;very fond of the young man&#8221; and felt that Herr Adolf Hitler was a &#8220;nice&#8221; person.</i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MarcCuster</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-383</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-383</guid>
					<description>Ah, yes, the nice people.  Adolph Hitler was considered to be nice in person.  He was noted to be charming to some, good with children, even stylish.  One only has to look at some of the &quot;select&quot; films of him at the Berghoff.  He even loved his dog Blondie.  Let us not forget some of those tender moments he was filmed with Eva.  But like Bush, if you worked for him and did something wrong, he treated you like a worthless piece of rat doo doo, using vile foul lanuage and physical threatening gestures.

But calling Newt Gingrich nice!

Calling Katherine Harris nice!

As long as you don't know that much about the person, anyone can be fooled.  What is done in private, or in front of the camera may not be the real person.  These people have been trained.  Good manners does not always equate to being a good person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, the nice people.  Adolph Hitler was considered to be nice in person.  He was noted to be charming to some, good with children, even stylish.  One only has to look at some of the &#8220;select&#8221; films of him at the Berghoff.  He even loved his dog Blondie.  Let us not forget some of those tender moments he was filmed with Eva.  But like Bush, if you worked for him and did something wrong, he treated you like a worthless piece of rat doo doo, using vile foul lanuage and physical threatening gestures.</p>
<p>But calling Newt Gingrich nice!</p>
<p>Calling Katherine Harris nice!</p>
<p>As long as you don&#8217;t know that much about the person, anyone can be fooled.  What is done in private, or in front of the camera may not be the real person.  These people have been trained.  Good manners does not always equate to being a good person.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: poppy606</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-382</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-382</guid>
					<description>I completely agree with John, and think people have lost sight of what he is saying.  I may be reading it wrong but this is my take on his comments.

Firstly, when you meet someone for the first time without knowing that person, you form an initial opinion  based on many things, including  attitude,  body language, the tone of conversation etc.  First impressions may be completely wrong and you may come to dislike this person as you find out more about them.  Their beliefs, principals politics etc.  I guess in this instance you would say &quot;Can't stand that guy/girl but on first impressions they appeared quite nice.&quot;

The opposite can sometimes be true for people you initially dont like.  One of my best friends I didnt like at all when I first met her.  Shows you how first impressions can be wrong.

I believe John was simply saying is that when meeting these people in person, they can seem  &quot;quite nice&quot;  So what?!  Lighten up people or you run the risk of sounding like the people you are critisizing in the first place.  

Give a guy a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with John, and think people have lost sight of what he is saying.  I may be reading it wrong but this is my take on his comments.</p>
<p>Firstly, when you meet someone for the first time without knowing that person, you form an initial opinion  based on many things, including  attitude,  body language, the tone of conversation etc.  First impressions may be completely wrong and you may come to dislike this person as you find out more about them.  Their beliefs, principals politics etc.  I guess in this instance you would say &#8220;Can&#8217;t stand that guy/girl but on first impressions they appeared quite nice.&#8221;</p>
<p>The opposite can sometimes be true for people you initially dont like.  One of my best friends I didnt like at all when I first met her.  Shows you how first impressions can be wrong.</p>
<p>I believe John was simply saying is that when meeting these people in person, they can seem  &#8220;quite nice&#8221;  So what?!  Lighten up people or you run the risk of sounding like the people you are critisizing in the first place.  </p>
<p>Give a guy a break.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hizzhoner</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-381</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-381</guid>
					<description>Gotta weigh in on this...

John seems to think that a person can be separated from their acts...their behavior....they can be a &quot;pleasant person&quot; while committing unspeakable acts.  If they are capable of doing unspeakable things and disassociating themselves (as  a person ) from those acts then they are bipolar at best and pathological at worst....which, of course, doesn't exactly make them a :nice: person..

Newt, Dubya, sweet Katherine and many others have learned how to manipulate people to get them to &quot;like them&quot; ...it's a confidence game.

Pet a snake often enough and you're going to get bitten...it's their nature.

hizzhoner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta weigh in on this&#8230;</p>
<p>John seems to think that a person can be separated from their acts&#8230;their behavior&#8230;.they can be a &#8220;pleasant person&#8221; while committing unspeakable acts.  If they are capable of doing unspeakable things and disassociating themselves (as  a person ) from those acts then they are bipolar at best and pathological at worst&#8230;.which, of course, doesn&#8217;t exactly make them a :nice: person..</p>
<p>Newt, Dubya, sweet Katherine and many others have learned how to manipulate people to get them to &#8220;like them&#8221; &#8230;it&#8217;s a confidence game.</p>
<p>Pet a snake often enough and you&#8217;re going to get bitten&#8230;it&#8217;s their nature.</p>
<p>hizzhoner
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: byiny</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-380</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-380</guid>
					<description>(And by the way, I agree with tristero: Aravosis really should have kicked Katherine Harris in the shins when he had the chance.) Do you really think that? Here's what we'd be hearing on the news all day long: &quot;Crazy blogger attacks congresswoman at DC party. Just as we've always said, bloggers are crude, low-class idiots who sit around in their pajamas all day and make shit up.&quot; Would that have been better. I wish everyone would get off John's back already. Nice is a superficial word. I'm sure John realizes that these people are not so nice inside, but were merely acting nice. Give the guy a break. He's done too much good to be attacked relentlessly over some frivolous post. People are acting as if he's jumped ship, gone hetero and is going to marry Katherine Harris. Enough already.

&lt;strong&gt;Reply from Steve&lt;/strong&gt;: I usually don’t reply to comments, feeling, I guess, this real estate belongs to the reader, but . . .

Did you really think either tristero or I were seriously suggesting John should actually have kicked Harris?  Seriously, pal, go to the part of your brain marked “humor” or even “weak attempts at humor” and switch the button from “off” to “on.”

And while you’re at it, you really read this post as some sort of blistering attack on John . . . ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(And by the way, I agree with tristero: Aravosis really should have kicked Katherine Harris in the shins when he had the chance.) Do you really think that? Here&#8217;s what we&#8217;d be hearing on the news all day long: &#8220;Crazy blogger attacks congresswoman at DC party. Just as we&#8217;ve always said, bloggers are crude, low-class idiots who sit around in their pajamas all day and make shit up.&#8221; Would that have been better. I wish everyone would get off John&#8217;s back already. Nice is a superficial word. I&#8217;m sure John realizes that these people are not so nice inside, but were merely acting nice. Give the guy a break. He&#8217;s done too much good to be attacked relentlessly over some frivolous post. People are acting as if he&#8217;s jumped ship, gone hetero and is going to marry Katherine Harris. Enough already.</p>
<p><strong>Reply from Steve</strong>: I usually don’t reply to comments, feeling, I guess, this real estate belongs to the reader, but . . .</p>
<p>Did you really think either tristero or I were seriously suggesting John should actually have kicked Harris?  Seriously, pal, go to the part of your brain marked “humor” or even “weak attempts at humor” and switch the button from “off” to “on.”</p>
<p>And while you’re at it, you really read this post as some sort of blistering attack on John . . . ? 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: byiny</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-379</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-379</guid>
					<description>God, I wish everyone would get the hell off hn's back.  Nice is a very superficial word.  I hardly think he doesn't realize that these people are not really nice inside, but merely act nice.  Please get over it.  People are acting as if he's gone over to the dark side - he didn't say he's going hetero and marrying Katherine Harris.  John does so much good and so much legwork for the rest of us, and now he's being relentlessly attacked for one frivolous post.  And do you really think the best thing would have been for him to kick Katherine Harris in the shins?  Guess what you would be hearing the next day in the news:  &quot;Crazy blogger attacks congresswoman at DC party.  Just as we've always tried to tell you, bloggers are just crude idiots who sit around in their pajamas making up shit&quot;.  Would you rather have it that way?  John did us all a service by representing the blogosphere in a classy and professional way.  Enough already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I wish everyone would get the hell off hn&#8217;s back.  Nice is a very superficial word.  I hardly think he doesn&#8217;t realize that these people are not really nice inside, but merely act nice.  Please get over it.  People are acting as if he&#8217;s gone over to the dark side - he didn&#8217;t say he&#8217;s going hetero and marrying Katherine Harris.  John does so much good and so much legwork for the rest of us, and now he&#8217;s being relentlessly attacked for one frivolous post.  And do you really think the best thing would have been for him to kick Katherine Harris in the shins?  Guess what you would be hearing the next day in the news:  &#8220;Crazy blogger attacks congresswoman at DC party.  Just as we&#8217;ve always tried to tell you, bloggers are just crude idiots who sit around in their pajamas making up shit&#8221;.  Would you rather have it that way?  John did us all a service by representing the blogosphere in a classy and professional way.  Enough already.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: iowametal76</title>
		<link>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-378</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://lastchancedemocracycafe.com/?p=165#comment-378</guid>
					<description>People say W is &quot;nice&quot; in person too.  

So fuckin what.

As you said, that's merely a weapon he/they use.  They're still horrible people.
And yes, in this case, I am self-righteous.
I'm also correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People say W is &#8220;nice&#8221; in person too.  </p>
<p>So fuckin what.</p>
<p>As you said, that&#8217;s merely a weapon he/they use.  They&#8217;re still horrible people.<br />
And yes, in this case, I am self-righteous.<br />
I&#8217;m also correct.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
