I just love this title
The New York Times: General Defends Rumsfeld, With a Caveat
So there you have it; this once supreme neocon “sex symbol” has now fallen so low that they can’t even come up with an uncaveated supporter to march before the media.
April 18th, 2006 at 6:36 am
“Sex Symbol?”….
Jeez, instead of bombing a bunch of innocent people couldn’t we have just fought the terr’ists by air-dropping about a billion color photos of Rumsfeld naked? That would be almost as devastating - I know it’d fuck me up waaaaaaayy too much to want to suicide-bomb anything - and it wouldn’t kill any children (permanantly scar them psychologically, sure, but at least they’d have all their limbs).
More proof I should be in charge. *sigh*