Mukasey’s reputation is on the line in the Siegelman case
If you didn’t see the 60 Minutes report on the Don Siegelman case, go to TPM Muckraker to check it out. In an Internet full of must sees, this is a MUST SEE.
There is simply no room left for doubt that the Bush Administration, in a glaring violation of well established ethical precepts, not to mention common decency, used the Justice Department to take down the Governor of Alabama for political reasons. And in the process, it appears very likely they sent an innocent man to prison.
I don’t practice criminal law, but I’ve been involved in peripheral ways in cases where the feds have been out to get someone, and I have to tell you, it’s a terrifying specter. The raw power, not to mention bottomless resources, the federal government can bring to bear against a citizen who’s subject to a criminal prosecution, or even just an investigation, is almost a force of nature. It’s like having an F-5 tornado bearing down on you, except this tornado is much more dangerous, since it’s being driven by human intelligence.
To misuse such power in a calculated effort to game the democratic process would be one of the worst public crimes imaginable.
All of which leads us directly to the doorstep of Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General of the United States. Remember that Mukasey, whose nomination was, of course, extremely controversial, was confirmed by the Senate based largely upon his pledge to keep politics out of the Department of Justice.
Well, Mr. Attorney General, it’s fish or cut bait time.
I don’t think that it’s too strong a statement to suggest that Mukasey’s entire professional reputation is on the line here. If he acts dishonorably, the rest of his very successful (if radically conservative) career will disappear into the fog of disrepute.
Mukasey is left with two choices: first, he can order a full, aggressive and independent investigation into the department’s actions in the Siegelman case and, if appropriate, go into court and move to have the conviction set aside; or, second, he can allow the ongoing cover-up and associated rot at Justice to continue, then pay the price in the damage to his own reputation.
What might seem like the obvious third option — a successful cover-up — just isn’t in the cards on this one. The noble stand taken by the 52 former attorneys general, representing 40 states and both political parties, who are demanding action in response to this injustice makes that impossible.
This from Scoot Horton’s blog at Harper’s Monthly discussing the 60 Minutes broadcast (Horton deserves tremendous credit for driving this story):
But the show was dominated by one of 52 former attorneys general from 40 of the 50 states who have called for a Congressional probe of the conduct of the Siegelman case, former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods. He leveled a series of blistering accusations at the Bush Administration’s Justice Department. With the Alabama G.O.P. this evening issuing a near-hysterical statement in which it characterizes the CBS broadcast—before its transmission—as an anti-Republican attack piece, it was notable that Woods, like the piece’s other star witness, is a Republican. Not just any Republican, either. Grant Woods is co-chair of the McCain for President leadership committee, and a lifelong friend and advisor to the presumptive 2008 G.O.P. presidential candidate. Woods is also godfather to one of the McCain children.
This then is a cover-up with a fairly short shelf life: in less than a year a new boss takes over. If it’s Obama or Clinton, say goodbye to the stonewalling. And if it’s McCain, given that his close friend and campaign supporter is one of the prime movers among the complaining former AGs (and McCain, as a new president, wouldn’t want to inherit a cover-up anyway), it will probably be the same story.
So that’s the deal, Mr. Attorney General: you can try looking the other way and then wait for history (and perhaps worse depending on the level of your involvement) to hunt you down — and it won’t be much of a wait. Or you can do the right thing, and earn yourself a page in some future book celebrating profiles in legal courage.
It’s your call, General. Choose well.
Shut-off loan malaysia s do not interfere with aircraft avionics; loan malaysia is partially based on the crash of Crossair Flight 498.
online college student loans
The handset constantly listens for online college student loans signal being received from the surrounding base stations.
income rental loan loans manitoba
Mobile Applications are developed using income rental loan loans manitoba M’s (previously Five M’s) service-development theory created by the author Tomi Ahonen with Joe Barrett of Nokia and Paul Golding of Motorola.
student help loans with
The Nordic Mobile Telephone (NMT) system went online in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden in 1981.
Until the early 1990s, most kiloan laundry s were too large to be carried in kiloan laundry pocket, so they were typically installed in vehicles as car phones.
wamu loan requirements
This is wamu loan requirements used to load wamu loan requirements s on PDA phones such as the Kyocera 6035 and the Handspring Treo.
for broker loans mortgage
Even with this information, the State of California recently passed for broker loans mortgage phone law that requires drivers over the age of 18 to use a hands-free device while using the phone in the car.
casino mortgage online amazon loan
Mobile phone usage on local public transport is also increasingly seen as casino mortgage online amazon loan the city of Graz, for instance, has mandated a total ban of casino mortgage online amazon loan s on its tram and bus network in 2008 (though texting is still allowed).
with $3000 loan bad credit
Mobile news services are expanding with many organizations providing “on-demand” news services by SMS.
bed loano breakfast
These sites originally created large cells, and so had their antennae mounted atop high towers; bed loano breakfast were designed so that as the system expanded—and cell sizes shrank—the antennae could be lowered on their original masts to reduce range.
mobile free for virgin ringtones
This system included variable transmission power in both mobile free for virgin ringtones stations and the telephones (controlled by mobile free for virgin ringtones stations), which allowed range and cell size to vary.
Mobile payments were first trialled in Finland in 1998 when two coca cola machines in Espoo were enabled to work with SMS payments.
pcs ringtones metro
The consistency of increased crash risk between hands-free and hand-held phone use is at odds with legislation in over 30 countries that prohibit hand-held phone use but allow hands-free.
ringtones iphone for
Nokia phones can receive ringtones iphone for s as ringtones iphone for message.
free gospel ringtones
This would eventually put free gospel ringtones or in this case, Bell Mobility out of business.
your create ringtone own
An exception to this are international roaming tariffs, by which receiving calls are normally also charged.
Caller ID signals are sent during mosquito ringtones interval between the first and second bursts of the ringing signals.
cellular for ringtones us phones
In fixed POTS phones, ringing is said to be “tripped” when cellular for ringtones us phones of the line reduces to about 600 ohms when the telephone handset is lifted off the switch-hook.
sanyo ringtones free
In old phones, this voltage was used to trigger sanyo ringtones free electromagnet to ring a bell on the phone.
cellular ringtones free us
The Internet-based transition was further marked in 2005 with the on-air, G4TechTV review of “SmashTheTones” (now “Mobile17″), the first third-party solution to allow cellular ringtones free us creation on cellular ringtones free us without requiring downloadable software or a digital audio editor.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:12 am
He’ll order an investigation. It won’t really be impartial, but it will drag on & on.
And remember too, if the innocent prisoner was a “black”, he wouldn’t stand a chance. And yes I do harp on the subject a lot.
February 26th, 2008 at 9:16 am
I saw that program. We’ve seen 60 minutes break a story before and it was made to “go away” even though it was all true. I don’t have any faith in the news or the courts or the DOJ or Mukasey. So what if they investigate? No one will cooperate. Rove and the rest will just refuse the subpoenas, will refuse to turn over evidence and will deny the charges. End of story?
I hope not but I am not expecting justice. Hell, I was sure that Plamegate would take Rove down. HA! I can be so stupidly naive. Not this time. Low expectations are my new mindset. I’m tired of saying, “If a Democrat had done that, they’d hang him by his thumbs”, because the truth is ….if a republican does it, he gets away with it and they still hang the dem by his thumbs.
Yes, the awesome power of the gov’t to investigate and prosecute anyone that gets in their way should be a terrible crime, but just like torture……..
it’s not a crime when THEY do it.
February 26th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Mukasey’s reputation is on the line in the Siegelman case…
There is simply no room left for doubt that the Bush Administration, in a glaring violation of well established ethical precepts, not to mention common decency, used the Justice Department to take down the Governor of Alabama for political reasons. And…
February 26th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
I don’t care if you are a republican or a democrat, when is enough, enough?????
February 26th, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Shades of Sacco and Vanzetti.
February 27th, 2008 at 12:50 am
When will we do something, other than complain about what “WE ARE ALLOWING TO HAPPEN?”
February 27th, 2008 at 11:22 am
CONVINCE me that there is no way this gets buried and K rove walks away laughing and carrying a “Free Don Siegelman” banner. (Harper’s-pic)
What are the options if they stall? If they refuse to testify? They haven’t gotten ANY cooperation from him nor have they been able to charge him with anything. He’s free to lie on Fox news! Would he be able to back that talk up under oath? Would he take an oath?
I don’t know beans about legalese.
From where I sit, they just refuse to cooperate, claim it’s a political witchhunt and stall until the SC or the POTUS let them off the hook.
How is this any different or easier to prosecute? Is it because of Thompson’s testimony? I hope it’s because the 52 noble AGs and Woods won’t let it go.
I hope they are determined to clean up the DOJ but that Mukasey …….I don’t know…..he’s there to protect the criminals, how can we trust him to go after a big fish like “Moby Dick”.(Scott Horton said he also calls himself Grendel and Lord Valdemort)
From Steve: I don’t trust Mukasey, but I also don’t write him off. As an old retired judge he does care about his reputation: he cares about it a lot — bank of it. And hopefully this will spur him to action. If not, one thing’s for sure: the walls of deceit come tumbling down in January of 2009 when Bush goes back to doing whatever he goes back to doing. Too many high profile people are on top of this for it to simply go away. Unfortunately, that could leave what is probably an innocent man sitting in prison for another year at least, not a happy thought.
February 27th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Who out there would have the gumption and energy to clean out the nest of vipers and restore the political prisoners from the wide range of gulags, particularly in the face of “Coddling terrorists and criminals” swiftboating that is as sure as mud from a rainstorm? Such lists should be compiled and vetted now so that a complete Justice Department could be in place, with people generally recognized as ideal from day one rather than some group put togeather by a key insider of any campaign. No one person knows enough, but an open discussion should bring the best to light.
I suppose such talk should start for the rest of the Cabinet, no matter who is elected. It is well past time that such jobs were filled with those who would do the peoples business, and not some shady business. The entire Bureaucracy is packed deep with the Gang Of Pirates and it will take the best people possible to make any traction at all to accomplish anything.
I do not say this with any outstanding confidence that the Democrat will win the election, or even (unfortunately ) that there will even be on. But while we must prepare to address the bad possibilities, we really need to spend the time to make sure the good outcomes are as good as possible as well.
February 28th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Good post FreeDem.
Every gov’t department has been gutted and filled with inept cronies and industry insiders. It will an enormous task to put ethical people in position to rebuild the very foundations they have been chipping away at for many years.
What do think about Edwards as AG?
Gore in the Energy or Interior dept?
Paul Krugman for the Treasury
Bill Moyers for Press Sec
Kucinich for the GAO
Homeland (I hate that name) Security?
Yes, they need to have an open discussion. There are lot of interesting people out there that we can actually trust. I’d love to hear them give us an idea of what they are thinking about the rebuilding of not just our infrastructure but our institutions.
February 28th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
not a happy thought at all. I hate injustice and those slowly grinding wheels.
I was just reading Palast on the Exxon Valdez and the nineteen years they have been able to put off compensating the fisherman whose lives they ruined.
“That was part of Exxon’s plan. They told me that. In 1990 and 1991, I worked for the Chenega and Chugach Natives of Alaska on trying to get Exxon to pay up to save the remote villages of the Sound. Exxon’s response was, “We can hold out in court until you’re all dead.”
One man named Paul Komkoff did die waiting. If the SC and Justice Roberts have their way, the rest will follow him.
After all, Tort Reform is more important than a bunch of dead fisherman.